Not One American Child Has the Constitutional Right to a Free Public Education

It is remarkable to me that although issues of discrimination in education have been adjudacated with the equal protection of all citizens under the law being upheld by numerous court cases—Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka comes to mind—we tend to forget (or may never have realized) that American children do not have a Constitutionally-guaranteed, Fundamental Right to a free, public education.

As I have Googled my way through this topic, almost all of what I’ve encountered are reports and op eds about challenges and successes related to ensuring equality in American public education, but there is precious little written about the absence of the Fundamental Right to free public education.

It would be correct to point out that every state does have statutes that affirm their responsibility to provide public education, but as the Education Commission of the States related in their “50-State Review:”

States differ in the constitutional foundation of their public education systems. The specific wording used to describe the public school system has consequences for how schools are funded in each state. In recent years, the constitutional language mandating the creation of public schools has been the basis for school finance court cases in some states.

I think you will find (if you have the energy to swim through miles of legal mud) that the cases referred to are often related to equal protection under the law, and not whether an American child has the right to a free public education, so here are three things I try to keep in mind related to this topic:

  1. There is a lack of uniformity across the country, state-by-state, in terms of how to apply the concept of a free public education.
  2. Constitutional assurances of equality in free public education are not the same as the right to a free public education; or looked at in another way: if there is no legal basis for providing a free education for every student in a state, and the requirement for universal public education in that state is legislated away, the issue of equality becomes legally (but to my mind, certainly not morally) moot.
  3. In a state ruled by a Conservative Republican governor and by a Conservative Republican state legislature, these players can decide to remove whatever act or law exists that requires the provision of public education to all students because there is nothing in the  U.S. Constitution that requires each American child in every state or commonwealth to have access to a free, high-quality, public education—or any kind of education.

A year ago, I spoke privately with a Pennsylvania State Senator who then served on the State Senate’s Education Committee. What he told me was that what Republican Senators on the committee had expressed  privately to him was that they thought Pennsylvania should get out of the education business entirely (my words; his point) because “they didn’t want their tax dollars to keep going down the drain” (of failing schools).

You will not find prominant leaders in the Army of Liberty (see: The War Between Equality and Individual Freedom) advocating for the end of public education, but you will hear them advocating for the “free market” to control American Education, which has the same inevitable result of ending universal public education (see: Survival of the Fittest Should Not Be the Basis of Universal Public Education). It is not just ironic that a very wealthy spokesperson for free market control of education is the Secretary of Education; it is entirely puposeful.

In a recent Diane Ravitch blog post, “Michigan Lame Duck GOP Power Grab Over Education,” she claims that “GOP free-market policies have severely damaged education. (Michigan’s) NAEP standing has plummeted over the past decade. But they can’t let go. The DeVos Republicans want to stay in power after losing the election.”

It is THIS ISSUE, the focus of Conservative Republicans, the Army of Liberty, on ending universal public education (which IS ironic), that should be challenged by the Democratic Party, the Army of Equality. Championing the opposing point of view, along with four other key challenges, should be the shouted planks of the Democratic brand:

  1. High-quality, free and universal public education must be made a Constitutional Right of all American children.
  2. There must be universal health care; Medicare for All, if you will.
  3. There must be a Constitutional Right for Americans to receive a living wage.
  4. The United States must once again resume leadership in things environmental, including participation in the Accord de Paris.
  5. We must become, once again, a country that is based upon and committed to the Rule of Law.

If you would like to learn more about the absence of Constitutional guarantees for public education, I encourage you to read Noliwe Rooks’ book, “Cutting School: Privatization, Segregation, and the End of Public Education,” which makes the argument for such guarantees while indicting those, like the DeVos family et al, who have been and are complicit in shredding the notion that free, high-quality, public education for every American child should be a Fundamental Right under the Constitution.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.